Hydra CE Study

Hydra THV OLD-Trial Results

Performance Outcomes

One-year Follow-up Study Results( N=157)

Mean Aortic Valve Gradient and Effective Orifice Area (EOA)

Paravalvular leak

Long-term Follow-up Study Results (N=54)

Mean Aortic Valve Gradient and Effective Orifice Area (EOA)

Paravalvular leak

Conclusion

The results of the Hydra CE study demonstrated favorable and sustained 3-year safety and performace providing large effective orifice area and low transvalvular gradient as well as high survival rates and acceptable complication rates with regards to paravalvular leak, new permanent pacemaker, stroke, major vascular complications, bleeding with the self-expanding Hydra THV in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and high or extreme surgical risk.

Additional Information

Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicsOne-year Follow-up Cohort (N=157)Long-term Follow-up Cohort (N=54)
Age (years)79.2±7.181.0 ± 4.1
Age <75 years32 (20.4)3 (5.6)
Male65 (41.4)15 (27.8)
Body-mass index26.0±5.228.6 ± 5.3
Body surface area, kg/m21.7±0.21.8 ± 0.2
Coronary artery disease65 (41.4)21 (38.9)
Previous CABG22 (14.0)9 (16.7)
Previous PCI38 (24.2)12 (22.2)
History of MI ≥6 months17 (10.8)9 (16.7)
History of atrial fibrillation30 (19.1)18 (33.3)
Left bundle branch block7 (4.5)5 (9.3)
Right bundle branch block10 (6.4)7 (13.0)
Permanent pacemaker12 (7.6)8 (14.8)
Heart Failure14 (8.9)8 (14.8)
NYHA Functional Class
Class-I1 (0.6)0
Class-II77 (49.0)16 (29.6)
Class-III72 (45.9)38 (70.4)
Class-IV7 (4.5)0
Diabetes mellitus48 (30.6)11 (20.4)
Hypertension125 (79.6)51 (94.4)
Prior stroke13 (8.3)3 (5.6)
Prior TIA00
Peripheral artery disease4 (2.5)1 (1.9)
Chronic kidney disease40 (25.5)31 (57.4)
COPD21 (13.4)4 (7.4)
Asthma8 (5.1)1 (1.9)
Pulmonary hypertension19 (12.1)4 (7.4)
Moderate/severe AR17 (10.8)0
Moderate mitral regurgitation16 (10.2)1 (1.9)
Moderate tricuspid regurgitation15 (9.6)2 (3.7)
STS Score (%)4.7±3.43.2 ± 2.0
EuroScore II5.1±4.94.0 ± 3.2
Haemoglobin, g/dL11.9±2.012.7 ± 1.5
Serum creatinine, μmol/L 1.2±1.11.1 ± 0.4
Creatinine >2 mg/dL10 (6.4)3 (5.6)
eGFR, mL/min/1.73m259.0±21.662.01 ± 15.5
LVEF, % 56.4±13.254.6 ± 5.6
Mean aortic gradient, mmHg49.5±18.553.4 ± 14.24
Aortic valve area, cm2 0.7±0.20.68 ± 0.15
Prior stroke13 (8.3)3 (5.6)
Prior TIA00

Procedural Characteristics

VariablesOne-year Follow-up Cohort (N=157)Long-term Follow-up Cohort (N=54)
Trans-femoral Access157 (100)54 (100)
18 Fr introducer sheath (Cook Check-Flo)157 (100)54 (100)
Local anaesthesia and conscious sedation69 (43.9)48 (88.9)
Implanted valve size
Hydra 22 mm4 (2.5)0
Hydra 26 mm72 (45.9)19 (35.2)
Hydra 30 mm81 (51.6)35 (64.8)
Pre-dilatation126 (80.3)53 (98.1)
Post-dilatation81 (51.6)27 (50.0)
Procedure time, min122.8±57.0116.8 ± 36.4
Fluoroscopy time, min31.7±18.827.6 ± 12.0
Contrast Volume, mL130.7±72.2140.4 ± 50.3
Duration of hospital stay, days7.2±6.38.8 ± 7.7

Device Success

VariablesN=15795% CI
Device Success130 (82.8%)75.8, 88.2
Successful implantation148 (94.3%)89.0, 97.2
One valve implanted (i.e. no need for second valve)148 (94.3%)89.0, 97.2
Proper anatomical location146 (93.0%)87.5, 96.3
Single valve in correct position142 (90.3%)84.5, 94.4
Aortic valve area >1.2 cm2145 (92.4%)86.7, 95.8
Mean aortic valve gradient <20 mmHg150 (95.5%)90.7, 98.0
Moderate or severe paravalvular leak11 (7.0%) 3.3, 11.7
Prosthesis–patient mismatch22 (14.0%)9.2, 20.7
Severe prosthesis–patient mismatch9 (5.7%2.8, 11.0
Procedural mortality3 (1.9%) 0.2, 5.0
Scroll to Top